Showing posts with label Visual Evidence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Visual Evidence. Show all posts

Saturday, March 14, 2015

A Pi Day for the Ages

Mark your calendars and set your alarms for Saturday, March 14, 2015, at 9:26.53 a.m.

Or, in another means of expression,

3/14/15 @ 9:26:53

This, of course, for those of you who do not already have your calendars marked, represents the first ten digits of the mystical ratio known for ages by the Greek letter, pi 

Here at PhilosFX, we have a tradition of celebrating Pi Day in numbers. Here is a look at Numbers of Note on Pi (3.14) Day, 2015


I do not know if my "blogological" musings are helping or hindering anyone else, but this I do know: 


My blogging may not change the world, but 
Blogging changes me, and then 
I change the world.

Keep on bloggin'!


Albert Einstein was born on March 14, which is also celebrated as Pi Day,
honoring the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter,
otherwise known as the  mathematical constant π. Credit: Biography.com


R. Crumb is considered by many to be the
single best cartoonist America has ever produced.






Previous posts on this Pi Day Par-tay theme:


Friday, March 14, 2014

Pi Day 2014

It's Fri-day Pi Day. Let's Par-Tay!

Great pic! Stolen from Angelique,
who stole it from Suzi Q,
who just found it, honest! 

I like to celebrate Pi Day (3/14) with

  • a little tribute to Albert Einstein, born 135 years ago today (March 14, 1879)
  • a few entertaining Pi(e) jokes, puzzles, riddles, or amusements, and
  • the annual review of PhilosFX blog stats


First: Albert. I've always appreciated Einstein's curiosity, his quirky sense of humor, his faith, and his quest for simplicity amid complexity. Here is his endearingly straightforward explanation of his Theory of Relativity:

Poster: Found on Google+

And now for some Pi...e diversions:

  • This is amusing: http://www.angio.net/pi/ (Thanks, MG's Mom)
  • On the other hand, this is just baffling: http://www.piday.org/million/ (Thanks(?) DelBai, but what are we supposed to do with this information? ha!) 
  • A puzzle for you, adapted from one heard recently on NPR's Car Talk. 
Thirteen matches are arranged as shown in the attached illustration. The Roman numerals form an incorrect equation, namely, 23 divided by 7 equals 2. Move one match and one match only to create a correct equation. Using one match to change the equals sign into an unequal sign is rational, but there is a more elegant solution. Can you solve the puzzle?




Finally, this year's PhilosFX update. It's been a great year for PhilosFX! We just crossed over 111,111 unique visitors. I honestly do not know if that number is big or small, but it sure is interesting!



I do not know if my musings are helping or hindering anyone else, but I do know this: blogging does not change the world; blogging changes me, and then I change the world.

Keep on bloggin' on!

Previous posts on this Pi Day Party theme:
Until next year, thanks for reading, sharing, and engaging! Now, let's go get some


Wednesday, February 19, 2014

SeekABrew US Distribution Map


SeekABrew US Distribution Map

For readers who join me on The Quest for Brewed Nirvana, I would like to share a helpful tool.  The US Distribution Map by Seek-A-Brew is available HERE.

The home page looks like the screenshot above. Press Virginia, for example, and you will learn that 137 brewers distribute their wares in our fair state, as of the latest version.

The site offers a compare feature, which returns a Venn diagram of two states. Here in the Commonwealth of Virginia, particularly in NoVA, we also have easy access to beers distributed in nearby states of Maryland, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, and the District of Columbia. By going across the Potomac to the north, Virginians gain access to 12 more brewers as shown in the table below. We can also venture east of the Potomac and enjoy 16 more brewers who distribute in Maryland.  Just a bit more effort to cross into Delaware and we are rewarded with access to 4 more.

Welcome to Beervana. Yes, Santa Claus, there is a Virginia!  

# Virginia not DC Virginia and DC Washington, DC not Virginia
1
Blue & Gray
21st Amendment
Ale Asylum
2 Blue Mountain Abita Anchorage
3 Bluegrass Allagash Arcadia
4 BridgePort Anchor Black Diamond
5 Buffalo Bill's Anderson Valley Brewers Art
6 Caldera [Limited] Atlantic Brewing DOG (Pub Dog)
7 Carolina Atwater Elysian
8 Central City [Limited] Avery Lakefront
9 Cigar City [Draft only] Ballast Point Port/Lost Abbey [Limited]
10 Clown Shoes [Limited] Bard's Tale Pretty Things
11 Cricket Hill Bear Republic Speakeasy
12 Dark Horse [Limited] Bells Uncommon Brewers
13 DC Brau [Limited] Bison  
14 Erie Blue Point Maryland not Virginia or DC
15 Evil Twin [Limited] Boston Beer Co. (Sam Adams)
Appalachian
16 Foothills [Limited] Boulder
Brewers Alley
17 Fort Collins Boulevard
FiftyFifty [Limited]
18 Great Divide [Limited] Breckenridge
Lake Placid
19 Hardywood Park [Limited] Brooklyn
Legacy - CLOSED
20 Highland Butternuts
McSorley's (Pabst brand)
21 Hook & Ladder Cape Ann
Old Schoolhouse
22 Iron City Cisco
Oxbow [Limited]
23 Left Hand Coronado
Perennial [Limited]
24 Legend D.L. Geary's
Prairie Artisan Ales
25 Lost Coast Devils Backbone
Rahr & Sons
26 Maine [Limited] Dixie
Saint Somewhere
27 Mountaineer Dogfish Head
Slumbrew
28 Pike Duck-Rabbit
Sly Fox
29 Sprecher [Limited] DuClaw
Thomas Hooker
30 Stevens Point Epic (Utah)
Union Brewing
31 Terrapin Evolution  
32 Thirsty Dog Firestone Walker Delaware not VA, DC, or MD
33 Thomas Creek Flying Dog
Iron Hill [Limited]
34 Three Heads Flying Fish
Moab
35 White Birch [Limited] Fordham
Stevens Point [Limited]
36 Yards Founders
White Birch
37   Full Sail  
38   Goose Island  
39   Gordon Biersch  
40   Great Lakes  
41   Green Flash  
42   Harpoon  
43   Heavy Seas - see Clipper City  
44   Hoppin Frog  
45   Jolly Pumpkin  
46   Kona  
47   Lagunitas  
48   Lancaster  
49   Laughing Dog  
50   Leinenkugel  
51   Lion Brewery  
52   Long Trail  
53   Lost Rhino  
54   Mad River (Steelhead)  
55   Magic Hat  
56   Matt (Saranac)  
57   Maui  
58   Mendocino  
59   Moylan's  
60   Napa Smith  
61   New Belgium  
62   New Holland  
63   North Coast  
64   Old Dominion  
65   Ommegang  
66   Oskar Blues  
67   Otter Creek  
68   Peak Organic  
69   Penn  
70   Port City  
71   Pyramid  
72   Redhook  
73   River Horse  
74   RJ Rockers  
75   Rogue  
76   Schlafly  
77   Sea Dog  
78   Shelton Brothers (importers)  
79   Shenandoah  
80   Shipyard  
81   Shmaltz (He'Brew)  
82   Sierra Nevada  
83   Sixpoint  
84   Smuttynose  
85   Southampton  
86   Southern Tier  
87   Spoetzl (Shiner)  
88   St. George  
89   Starr Hill  
90   Stillwater  
91   Stone  
92   Stoudt's  
93   The Bruery  
94   Tommyknocker  
95   Troegs  
96   Uinta  
97   Victory  
98   Weyerbacher  
99   Widmer Bros.  
100   Williamsburg AleWerks  
101   Yuengling  

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

A short guide to the Middle East


The Middle East Explained In One Excellent Letter To The Editor


This letter to the editor from Mr. K. N. Al-Sabah ran in the Aug 24th edition of Financial Times.  It was then picked up by BuzzFeed.
 

 
 
This Quixotic quote inspired me to attempt a drawing of the social network described in Mr. Al-Sabah's letter.
 


Assuming we do want to get involved in the Middle East, do we know enough to actually make the situation better?
 
 
Look in the comments under the article as it appears in BuzzFeed and you will find a visualization by Derpina which takes the form of a Flow Chart.
 
The first problem I have with Derpina's visualization is that the Turks are Sunni, not Shia. The second problem is that the flow chart makes the situation look deterministic, which is misleading. 
 
I believe my spaghetti chart above captures the chaos more accurately, in my never humble but always biased opinion.
 
That said, I believe this version by the Elder of Zion is even better. His is an improvement on one created by another blogger, the big Pharaoh. As the Elder of Zion states, any attempt to understand this situation will change daily.
 
I wonder if this idea of graphing the complex social networks in the Middle East would make a fun parlor game? I wonder what I will think of this post when I look back on it in 10 years?
 
 

Saturday, July 13, 2013

How P&G Presents Data to Decision-Makers - Tom Davenport - Harvard Business Review



I highly recommend this article by Tom Davenport in a recent Harvard Business Review.

"Those of us who believe that managers make better decisions when key data are presented visually tend to get very excited about all the innovation going on in the graphical display of information. (For a sampling of some new and cool tools, see the popular Hans Rosling TED talk.) However, if you work in a large organization and want it to make better use of data visualization, I'd argue that commonality is more important than creativity. If you can establish a common visual language for data, you can radically upgrade the use of the data to drive decision-making and action."
Innovative desktop "dashboard" displays, meeting spaces called "Business Spheres," and graphics such as the "heat map" shown above are fueling better decisions. 

H/T: DS

Monday, July 8, 2013

Cultural Map of the World

The Inglehart-Welzel Cultural Map of the World, constructed by sociopolitical scientists Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel based on the World Values Surveyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_(personal_and_cultural)

"Birds of a feather flock together."

Examine yourself. Set aside your present geographical location, your friends and family, and any financial boundaries for the moment. Examine your values. What really matters to you? If you could live anywhere in the world, where would you choose to live, and why?

I like a fairly uniform and relatively high standard of living, where the differences between people that really matter are the merits of their ideas. In this world, age, wisdom, and experience are valued equally with youth, potential, and energy. Education is the most important resource in moving people up and to the right on the map.

Sweden looks good to me...

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Metrics for the war on Military Sexual Trauma

Let's choose Military Sexual Trauma metrics with care:
Words matter, and numbers are the language of logic.


Image attribution: CloudFront.net, promotional photo for Invisible War


"Military sexual trauma [MST], which encompasses everything from sexual harassment to rape, is now the leading cause of post-traumatic stress disorder among women in the U.S. Military. Female Soldiers today are 180 times more likely to be sexually assaulted by a fellow Soldier than killed by an enemy."

The Military’s Sexual Assault Epidemic, 30 March 2013, The Week, emphasis added.


I want to help solve the military's sexual assault epidemic. The first half of the epigraph above has captured my attention and harnessed my passion as a decision analyst serving the military community. That said, there is something deeply concerning to me about the metric cited in the second half of the quote above, namely, that a woman in uniform is 180 times more likely to suffer military sexual trauma (MST) than to be killed by the enemy. 


But the metric is concerning for an unexpected reason: it's harmful to the cause! To say that a woman in uniform is 180 times more likely to be sexually assaulted by a fellow Soldier than killed by an enemy certainly catches one's attention in dramatic fashion. I'll grant that. Contrasting MST to combat death may be intended to communicate the severity of the MST epidemic, but it is a flawed comparison which sets wrong expectations, uses wrong standards, and addresses the wrong population. The ratio is seriously harmful to the victims of MST and the military's efforts to deal with the problem of MST. 


Bad metrics backfire. Let me first explain what is wrong with this metric, and then propose an alternative.



First of all, we have a problem with expectations. The bar has been set at 180, and we expect the ratio to get smaller as the situation improves. However, the ratio of MST to combat deaths is only going to get higher.  We have not seen the end of trauma-induced rage, abuse of power, and other combat-related issues contributing to the rise in sexual violence within the military. The causes of the spike in sexual violence will not stop producing their ill-effects overnight. As the wars draw down, combat deaths will decrease, which alone will cause the ratio to climb. Yet over the same time, the numbers of people acting out in sexually violent ways will likely increase. And hopefully, the reporting of these incidents will increase as well.  So the denominator will drop off to zero while the numerator may well spike. 



What will media sources such as The Week have to say when the ratio goes from 180 to 200? 300?
  • Will they condemn the Army's SHARP program?
  • Will they pillory the DoD's SAPRO again, as they rightfully did in the movie, the Invisible War?
  • Will they declare leaders from the SecDef on down inept or morally corrupt?
  • Will concerned citizens press their lawmakers to rewrite the UCMJ to remove certain authorities from all Commanders, instead of prosecuting any Commander who abuses his authority?

All of these reactions would be horrible outcomes for victims, undermining solid efforts to address the MST problem, and leading to further erosion of order and discipline in the ranks. We must replace this 180 metric with one which sets proper expectations. 

  • We want combat deaths to decline. 
  • We want 100% of MST incidents to be reported. We have reason to believe the majority of incidents are not reported, so even if the actual incident rate is unchanged, we actually want the numbers of reported cases to increase
  • And as soon as possible, we want the rate of incidents to drop off dramatically.


The proper expectation we should set and focus on is that the ratio of reported incidents to actual incidents will climb to 100% from approximately 30% now, regardless of combat casualties.


Secondly, we have the issue of standards. Problems like bullying, suicide, drug abuse, armed robbery, and sexual violence are vexing, of course. However, given that the military is but a subset of the society it serves, it's irrational to expect perfect behavior from the military. People are people, and there will be some level of noisy behavior in any population. That's why we invest in our leaders to set positive examples, and to counsel and correct behavior that detracts from good order and discipline. But, leaders are people, too. I am not excusing crime by any means, just pointing out that "zero tolerance" means that crime will not be tolerated, not that it will not occur! Therefore, in order to maintain higher than "normal" standards of good order and discipline expected in a military unit, it's essential that commanders have authority to instill values, reform potential miscreants before they offend, and to prosecute them fully if they offend.

 

The phenomenon of sexual violence within the military is only a matter requiring Congressional oversight when such crimes occur disproportionately within the military. That appears to be the case right now. The task is to drive the rate of incidents to a rate below the civilian population. Any attempt to drive MST to zero is misguided because it is doomed to fail. We must get the standards right, and enforce them. 


  • This involves excoriating any leader who abuses his or her special position of trust and confidence. 
  • The reaction of contracting out Drill Sergeants because some Drill Sergeants abused recruits is insane. Prosecute the offending Drills to the max! 
  • The reaction of rewriting Section 60 of the UCMJ because one Convening Authority may have made a questionable call is ludicrous. Prosecute the allegation and punish the offender.   



Thirdly, we must use terms that accurately describe the population under consideration.
  • MST is not an Army problem, so let's not single out Soldiers. The term, "Servicemembers," includes Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coasties, and Soldiers, and is therefore preferred. 
  • MST is not a female problem. Most cases involve male perpetrators and female victims, but there are plenty of male on male, female on male, and female on female cases. The MST issue is gender neutral.
  • MST is not a sex problem. The perpetrators are not looking for sexual gratification. The perpetrators are looking for power, and sex is one weapon in the arsenal. The issue then is power dynamics, not sex or sexual tensions.  
  • MST is not a combat problem. The stress of combat, indeed the stress of repeated combat tours is likely a contributor to the military's failure to prevent MST. While combat may exacerbate MST, combat is not the root cause. Ending the wars will not solve the problem. 
  • MST is not a civilian problem. Until you have filled out your pre-deployment will and life insurance beneficiary forms, you have not begun to confront the prospect of laying down your life in combat. Military Sexual Trauma is a particular subset of sexual violence.

There are sociopaths in the world, and unfortunately, some make it into the military. It's unrealistic to put a group of mostly young people (including a percentage of society's emotionally challenged) through the gauntlet of a decade of war and expect them to behave collectively just as do their civilian counterparts. To solve the MST problem, we must focus our efforts on the target population: Servicemembers. 


  • male and female, 
  • all ranks, 
  • and all branches of service.

Female Soldiers today are 180 times more likely to be sexually assaulted by a fellow Soldier than killed by an enemy. That sounds horrible until one realizes that there are an estimated 19,000 sexual assaults per year in the military. These assaults take place among a million uniformed servicemembers. Servicemembers are exposed to the risk of blue-on-blue sexual assault 24 x 7, while they are only exposed to the risk of combat death when they are deployed to combat.  


A Better Metric


So far we have agreed that yes, there is a problem in the military and sexual violence is occurring at a rate higher than in society at large. And yes, sexual violence tears a team apart. It violates not only the victim but the values of the unit and the special trust citizens have in their military leaders to maintain good order and discipline while fighting and winning the Nation's wars. But the bottom line is that the metric used to describe the magnitude of the MST issue must be a comparison between military and civilian sexual violence.

  

The only real question is, at what point does a young person's risk of sexual violence have no bearing on his or her choices between military service, attending college, or getting a civilian job?


We send our sons and daughters into harm's way for reasons which reflect our National values and our vital National interests. That decision should be neutral on the question of blue-on-blue violence. We have a situation requiring Congressional oversight only when the decision is not neutral. If it's neutral or in favor of the military and the rate of incidents is greater than zero, there is still an MST problem but Congress can leave it to the military to address.    



The Road Ahead

It will be a long time before the efforts of SAPRO and SHARP achieve end-state goals
  • completely empower victims and potential victims,
  • engage bystanders and colleagues to prevent and intervene, and
  • control or eliminate the perpetrators and potential perpetrators.  

It could be years of sustained effort before DoD again looks like society at large in the area of sexual violence. During that same multi-year period of what we can only hope will be sustained effort, the bogus 180 metric can only go up, falsely implying that the situation is getting worse! We WANT reports of incidents to go UP. We WANT combat casualties to go DOWN. What is 180 now will double if we get what we WANT! And if we do nothing to counter the misinformation wrapped up in the 180 metric, pressure from society will undermine the military's best efforts.


Rape is always wrong and always an issue of utmost importance, perhaps particularly in high-performing teams such as our military formations. Given that some people do go to combat, the only time that MST is an issue for Congress, parents, or enlistees is when a person going to combat has a higher chance of being raped than his or her civilian counterpart. 




When we as a Nation send our sons and daughters into harm's way, we have a right to insist that their leaders keep the risks under control. We must also invest in those leaders and give them the tools they need to perform that role. And yes, the flip side is also true: bad leaders must be held accountable.
 


I applaud movies like Invisible War and media attention on the severity of the MST issue. There is a problem, and it must be dealt with, and the truth must come out. However, in the pursuit of truth I have a serious issue with a statistic that does more harm than good! Words matter, and numbers are the language of logic. This 180 ratio is harmful to the war on MST. Let's focus on the real problem with numbers, metrics, and scales that actually describe 


  • the correct expectations, 
  • the proper standards, and 
  • the actual people under consideration.


Thank you for your time in reading this message. Feel free to circulate it. Comments are welcome. 

Questions for interaction:


  • Have you seen The Invisible War? What did you think of it? If not, will you?
  • Have you or someone you know been affected by MST? Do you know where to get help? 
  • Have you come across any other metrics that seem to undermine the cause they supposedly support? 







 

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Pi Day Treat


PhilosFX is celebrating Pi Day (3.14) with some tasty numbers!






Wednesday, January 30, 2013

A Qualitative Value Map of the President's Agenda

Jonathan Newton / THE WASHINGTON POST
Image credit: Jonathan Newton / THE WASHINGTON POST

I listened to the "pre-game" coverage of the Inaugural address on NPR. What I heard were lots of reasons why we should not expect much from this address. Historically, Inauguration speeches are not meant to inspire much more than a healthy respect for a unique American trademark: the peaceful transition of power. Beyond that, we could expect some thoughts about reaching across the aisle and working together for a better tomorrow, but not much in the way of substance.


 

 
As evidence of these low expectations, some Americans are still wondering whether Beyonce lip-synced. If she lip synced, she synced her lips so expertly as to fool me. And while I admire authenticity, I also value risk management, and I have moved beyond this question.

Speaking of risk management, I will also admit that I had a morbid curiosity about whether Chief Justice Roberts would again muff the oath of office. Armed with a note card and an abundance of caution, he performed perfectly. One day, I hope to learn what flicker of thought momentarily interrupted the President's concentration, but I am prepared to wait for that answer, too. His verbal stumble was evidence of humanity, and nothing to dwell upon.

Of much more significance to me is the skillful way in which the President leveraged the moment. With no concern over his political future now that he's in his final term, he could afford to offer a bolder vision for America, and that he certainly did do. The fact that he gave his address on Martin Luther King, Jr Day was significant as well. He invoked Dr King with great effect. I got caught up on the passion and unexpected specificity of the President's remarks.

As a concerned citizen in middle age, I listened intently to the President's address. I heard a clear Purpose statement, drawn from the Constitution. I heard the compelling language of Ends, Ways, and Means. I also heard a vision for a progressive agenda--a call to action. As a scholar-practitioner of Value-Focused Thinking, I responded to his clear and compelling drumbeat:

Our Journey is not complete until

  • Boom, 
  • Boom, 
  • Boom...



Making a Qualitative Value Map of the President's Agenda: 
 

 
A Value-Focused Thinking look at President Obama's 2013 Inaugural Address



I have applied my VFT craft to the President's words and repackaged them below as if I were going to use them to make a math model of the President's agenda. Here is my breakdown of the Inauguration address in Value-Focused Thinking terms.


Fundamental Objective

aka Purpose, equivalent to the “Ends” in Ends = Ways + Means

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Vision

aka Desired Endstate / How we will know when we have achieved the Fundamental Objective

Today we continue a never-ending journey, to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time.  For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing; that while freedom is a gift from God, it must be secured by His people here on Earth. 

Objective Function(s)

aka Ways (we seek to Maximize these functions)
 
  • Freedom:
  • Equality:
  • Initiative: youth and drive
  • Transparency: diversity and openness
  • Entrepreneurial spirit: an endless capacity for risk (?)
  • A gift for reinvention?  (I think this means starting over or re-framing)
  • Skepticism of central authority (balance of power, gov’t works for the people)
  • Limited government (all society’s ills cannot be cured through government alone)
  • Celebration of initiative and enterprise
  • Insistence on hard work and personal responsibility
  • Being true to our founding documents / creed / principles (a reference to the Constitution, used at least 4 times)

Means Objectives

these are the “Means” by which we will maximize the Objective Functions “Ways” and achieve the Fundamental Objective “Ends”)

For our journey is not complete until (Specified)

  • Pay equality: our wives, our mothers, and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts
  • Advancing gay rights: our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law – for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well 
  • Voting reform: no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote
  • Immigration reform: showing more tolerance toward illegal immigrants: we find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as a land of opportunity; until bright young students and engineers are enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country
  • Ending gun violence: all our children, from the streets of Detroit to the hills of Appalachia to the quiet lanes of Newtown, know that they are cared for, and cherished, and always safe from harm
  • Preserving the social welfare safety net
  • Acting to stop climate change.

For our journey is not complete until (Implied)

 
 
  • Infrastructure: a modern economy requires railroads and highways to speed travel and commerce
  • Education: a modern economy requires schools and colleges to train our workers
  • Market regulation: a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play
  • Social Safety Net / Emergency Management: a great nation must care for the vulnerable, and protect its people from life’s worst hazards and misfortune
  • Diplomacy / Statecraft: A decade of war is now ending (peace dividend)
  • Economy: An economic recovery has begun (and must continue)
  • Environmental Protection: respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations
  • America’s prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class (tax reform)
  • We must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice – not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes:  tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice
  • A little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else, because she is an American, she is free, and she is equal, not just in the eyes of God but also in our own
  • Remake our government
  • Revamp our tax code
  • Reform our schools
  • Empower our citizens with the skills they need to work harder, learn more, and reach higher
  • We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate. 
  • Pragmatism: We must act, knowing that our work will be imperfect
  • We must act, knowing that today’s victories will be only partial, and that it will be up to those who stand here in four years, and forty years, and four hundred years hence to advance the timeless spirit
  • Citizenship: citizens have the obligation to shape the debates of our time – not only with the votes we cast, but with the voices we lift in defense of our most ancient values and enduring ideals


If asked, I would make a Qualitative Value Model of the President's vision. The next steps in my process of transforming the President's speech into a tool for strategic communication, math model would be the following:


  • Condense the Means Objectives to the collectively exhaustive and mutually exclusive few. Try for 7, plus or minus 2.
  • Develop Evaluation Measures for each Means Objective. These Evaluation Measures come in four types: leading or lagging measures, and measures of performance or effectiveness. The best model has a mix of the four types of Evaluation Measures.
  • Affirm the data sources for each Evaluation Measure and map the data to the measures.
  • In consultation with the Office of the President, develop Value Functions, which are like grading curves for converting data to scores. 
  • Add in a capability for Monte Carlo Simulation.  
  • Maintain the model by adjusting the weights and thresholds as required. 



I am looking forward to the more policy-oriented State of the Union address, where I hope to hear more details about how the President would implement his agenda during his second term. The odds of his success are not great, given the fact that the new Congress is not a lot different, in terms of party distribution, from the last one. The biggest advantage the President has in promoting an activist agenda is the simple fact that his performance rating has climbed into the 50s while Congress has sunk even lower than it had been before, if that can be imagined.


The President's approval rating has more influence on Congressional outcomes than the clarity of his speeches. Why? Because in this constitutional republic, concerned citizens are still in charge. People are fed up with gridlock in Congress. If the President's vision for the future is not the best, it is no longer sufficient to mock it or block it. someone m?

Anyone can lip sync a good speech.  What really matters is who listens to the words, and what the listeners do in response to them. If listeners continue to focus on delivery, we're doomed to more partisan rhetoric. Let's turn our focus to content. Let's get pragmatic so we can move forward together.

A Qualitative Value Map helps by delivering the following:


  • definition of what the objective looks like
  • how we will know when we have arrived
  • how we will measure success
  • how we know where we are relative to the objective
  • which investments would likely produce the most favorable impact on the system score.


I wonder why we don't already have such a powerful tool available. If you think a Qualitative Value Map would be a good thing, let me know, and I'll get right on it!


A transcript of President Obama 2013 inaugural address is HERE.